onionbagblog

The political hot potato that is privatised public swimming continues to rumble on. Whilst we’re still waiting for the roll out of the @LambethLabour election manifesto pledge of “free swimming for every resident,” our Red Flag flying friends in the Rotten Borough have now pulled free swimming for under 16′s and over 60′s.

Ah - but have they? Not on my watch etc, and it is of course those nasty ConDems who have been doing the cutting, according to the Comrades @LambethLabour. Using this logic, and your entire election manifesto might as well have been written on the back of a fag packet, with the handy opt out cause of blaming the bigger Westminster political picture whenever you get your kickers in a twist over the calculations locally.

Cripes.

But swimming is still a public service that resonates with many. There’s votes out there in those swimming lanes, doncta know. Right of centre politicians, be they ConDems or @LambethLabour, know this all too well. This is the political logic behind the passing the buck policy of #bigsociety and #lambethcoop.

But could swimming actually be left to the Little People to run? Patrick Butler has posted up an excellent blog post over at Guardian Society, examining specifically what is required for the pubic to take over the management of a local authority owned pool.

The sales pitch for #lambethcoop states that everything is up for grabs - housing, education, swimming. It’s the great Rotten Borough give away - the buggers will give to the Little People, and then bugger off until polling day comes around once again.

Butler makes the worthy point that the public management of swimming pools will probably only work in middle class suburbs where the locals have the time, knowledge and political capital to make such a proposition happen. The only collective spirit you’ll find at Brixton Rec is the continued moaning over the state of the changing rooms, the queues at reception or the over crowding of the pool.

The advice offered by Butler to any Speedo clad civic minded swimmer is to get support from the local authority:

“The state and its agencies still matter: big society swimming pools don’t survive in an infrastructure support-free zone.”

Too true here in Lambeth. Streatham is propped up (and closed) with support from the corporate paymaster of Tesco. Clap’ham is propped up (and running two years plus behind schedule) thanks to the Cathedral Group’s mismanagement of private capital.

I often think that we have reached the nadir of leisure provision here in Lambeth. It was looking bleak when Streatham closed last year. Clap’ham soon followed, and then in the same month, Brixton operated the bonkers 7am - 9am only swimming policy.

With only one leisure centre now remaining in the Rotten Borough, and ALL free swimming removed, the plug has all but been pulled from the public provision of leisure in Lambeth.

Maybe it is this absolute rock bottom that might just kick start the Little People to fight back and actually consider running the facilities collectively? Offering an inferior service than that currently provided by @LambethLabour isn’t possible.

But then this would be the reaction that the Comrades at the Town Hall would no doubt see as an endorsement of the PR farce that is #lambethcoop. The reality would be the exact opposite - collective action against the inability of the local authority to provide a service, rather than a co-operative partnership working in support of the local council.

Either way, it still represents a failure of the right wing privatisation of leisure in Lambeth by @LambethLabour, and the long-term consequences that this will leave for years within the Rotten Borough.