Best Kept Private

obb » 11 January 2010 » In brixton, lambeth, south london, swimming »

And so the privatisation of leisure in Lambeth is complete. This was confirmed at the meeting of the Clap’ham Users Forum on Monday, when upon leaving, a very enterprising chap from Fitness First leafleted Lambeth users, enticing them with the slogan of: “Fitness First is OPEN.”

Ouch.

You can pay your £50 per month to Fitness First and guarantee leisure facilities, or wait for Labour led Lambeth Council to try and resolve the privatisation back door leisure policy that has led to all three centres in the Rotten Borough being closed next month.

The quarterly meeting of Clap’ham users with Greenwich Leisure Limited management and Lambeth Council officials, commenced with the confirmation that Clap’ham will be closing on 15th January.

The decision to padlock up the SW4 pool wasn’t taken by Lambeth Council; it wasn’t even taken by GLL. Private capital group Cathedral gave the Council just two weeks notice to clear the site.

It’s a classic political case of you scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours. In return for building a reduced sized pool, Cathedral gets to build private property to sell on for profit. It also gets to control the time scale leading to the closure at Clap’ham.

The unfortunately named Future Clap’ham is already running two years behind schedule. Cathedral stalled on the project, leading locals to dub the failed project Past Clap’ham. If you accept that a new pool is needed (which is not a consensus amongst users,) then you also accept the two-year timetable of closure.

What you can’t accept however is how a local authority has lost complete control of the management of its own leisure facilities. Pimping out pools is a policy we expect from the Tories. For a Labour led Council to be cashing in on leisure, you can draw your own conclusions about the priorities of Labour in Lambeth.

The Invisible Hand of the free market hasn’t been kind to Lambeth Council. It’s not exactly been welcoming to the users either, delivering a punch in the face as the padlocks go up around the leisure centres in Lambeth.

Lambeth Council should have managed the closure of Clap’ham. With Streatham already closed (“waiting on further investment…“) and Brixton undergoing further refurbishment less than three years since £3m was ‘invested,’ Clap’ham should have remained open until a long term strategy at the other two centres was established.

Instead we have the mad scramble of Cathedral pulling down the shutters at Clap’ham, and Lambeth Council looking incredibly stupid in the run up to 2012. Who is actually in control of running leisure in the Rotten Borough? The elected council or big business? It’s certainly not the users.

After the headline news of the closure at the forum, angry users looked around the room to try and find some answers and accountability. Lambeth Council sent along a poor payroll leisure flunkey, who although seemed genuinely concerned, was not an electable official who is responsible for the mismanagement of leisure.

Yer poor man took a right kicking, and looked around the room as well for support from any local councillors. Despite fighting (and winning) the last local election on the platform of Keep Clap’ham Swimming (ha!) not one local Labour councillor felt the need to turn up and explain the political decisions taken that have led to the closure of Clap’ham.

It’ not just about the users either. Although not wanting to go into exact details, GLL management confirmed that a series of “staff consultations” were currently in place. This is boardroom talk for redundancies.

Further questions were asked about the guarantee of the new Clap’ham pool actually opening. Given the shoddy (and delayed) re-opening of the Rec since the last refurbishment, Labour has a track record of failing to complete leisure projects on time.

No guarantees were given, but then you wouldn’t expect any firm guarantees from civil servants on the Council payroll, in the absence of any accountable local politicians.

With little else to say about the failure at Clap’ham, attention turned to Streatham and Brixton. A report has been sent to the Council concerning the feasibility of further investment at Streatham. It wasn’t clear if that further investment was money put in from the Council, or Labour’s usual backdoor trick of waiting for the private sector to foot the bill.

Brixton remains our only hope – ha! No plans or predictions have been made as to the probable increase in users whilst Clap’ham and Streatham remain shut. Given that you can only swim at Brixton between the hours of 7am – 9am, this seems incredibly short sighted, not to mention rather congested.

The winner out of this complete failure to invest in leisure within the Rotten Borough is the private sector. Yer man from Fitness First dishing out the flyers wasn’t short on interested users. Labour led Lambeth Council has achieved its desired aim of letting leisure go the way of the private sector.

What’s up for grabs next?

Listen!

  • Print
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Netvibes
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • email
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

Tags: , , , ,

Trackback URL

15 Comments on "Best Kept Private"

  1. obb
    Gaijingirl
    11/01/2010 at 10:13 pm Permalink

    Good article – I had to laugh in parts – otherwise I might have cried. It’s all utterly shameful and depressing.

    gg

  2. obb
    Julia Bellis
    12/01/2010 at 12:45 pm Permalink

    Oh God. This just depresses me. Losing the pool in Streatham has been horrendous. I don’t have much faith in Lambeth Council’s ability to defend the ice rink from evil Tesco.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] so on the final morning of swimming in SW4, I departed Clap’ham Manor Street pool, reflecting on fifteen years ...

  2. Slippery SW9 Slope | onionbagblog 18/01/2010 at 6:00 pm

    [...] 1 in the Rotten Borough since Labour led @lambeth_council privatised leisure, and we didn’t get off to a great ...

  3. Ghost Swim | onionbagblog 19/01/2010 at 6:53 pm

    [...] all the talk over swimming (or lack of it) in Clap’ham, Brixton and St Reatham over the past few ...

  4. Lambeth Lego Pool | onionbagblog 25/01/2010 at 8:31 pm

    [...] thought I was being objective in my observations. Streatham and Clap’ham pools are both shut, and Brixton is the ...

  5. [...] I can only write about what I know and what I see happening around me on a local level. ...

  6. [...] London members were given assurances at the Users Forum to announce the closure of Clap’ham Pool that all GLL ...

  7. | onionbagblog 04/02/2010 at 7:00 pm

    [...] been a spot of local bother with the Labour party in Lambeth. You may have read about it over ...

  8. Streatham Hub Hubris | onionbagblog 11/02/2010 at 1:54 am

    [...] that’s not true. My agenda concern is the lack of swimming in Lambeth. As a Clap’ham refugee I’ve been ...

  9. [...] have thought a Primark council would have been more appropriate, given the current shoddy state of leisure and housing ...

  10. [...] so what price on the privatisation of leisure by Labour led @lambeth_council? Apart from the inconvenience of the nearest ...

  11. Re member Re member | onionbagblog 21/02/2010 at 12:09 pm

    [...] forward to this week, and for the first time since the privatisation of leisure in Lambeth, I was able ...

  12. Talley Hoey Dives In | onionbagblog 21/02/2010 at 2:44 pm

    [...] out with the llocal Lambeth Labour party over leisure seems to be something of a recurring theme for prospective ...

  13. [...] limited opportunities available to swim in public pools in Lambeth, I thought I would attempt to uncover the options ...

Hi Stranger, leave a comment:

ALLOWED XHTML TAGS:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe to Comments