University of Back Scratching
And so what has changed in the re-submitted planning application [PDF] by the University of Essex to build a multi-story car park, that has led the apolitical planning officers of Colchester Borough Council to recommend that the controversial scheme gets the go ahead when the Planning Committee next meets on 24th May?
Well…
The number of parking spaces has been reduced.
By two.
Yep – from 779 in the original application that was pulled from the agenda last month at the last moment, to 777.
On yer bike, etc.
Oh ye cycling sustainability cynic. There’s actually a little more meat in the re-submitted application that has given the Boundary Road multi-deck carbuncle the green light. Dig a little deeper, scratch a little more in a touchy feely way, and you can see how planning matters are all a matter of compromise.
Well, almost nearly all…
There’s the small matter of £250k heading the way of Wivenhoe, via University Section 106 funding from the Knowledge Gateway. The locals will get a much needed cycle path between the town’s Fire Station and the University, under the proviso that the car park gets the Planning Committee’s seal of approval.
A positive move, for sure, but one wonders what is the need for a cycle path, now that the University is making it oh so very easy to park your car on campus?
Cllr Julie Young of St Andrew’s ward helped to broker the deal, and is keen to take the credit for the back scratching compromise:
“This is excellent for Wivenhoe, the cycle link has been wanted for so long, hopefully consent will be given for the car park and the money will be released, this is something I brokered between planning and the University.”
Sure, cycle paths need to be paid for, and when you are a local authority that is facing up to implementing cuts from the top down, sadly cycling is very low down on the agenda. But building a car park as the means to an end to providing cycling provision is like saying vote LibDem so that you don’t get the Tory bogeyman.
Oh, hang on…
It doesn’t tackle the core of the problem, namely the increasing number of cars on the road around the campus, something that the University is doing little to address. This is a view that is shared by Wivenhoe Town Council.
In a scathing submission to the apolitical planning officers, WTC argued:
“It will affect an overload on traffic routes, produce congestion on roads and have the effect of a reduction in the University’s support of the use of buses, which in term may cause a very good public transport system to be reduced, or even lost.
The proposal encourages car use. The University should instead be promoting cycling, as per their 1995 strategy in which their future plans were to reduce dependency on car usage by promoting cycling and installing a railway halt.
The proposal does not explain how the building of the car park will enhance sustainable transport.”
And so that will be a NO from WTC, then.
Objections have also been received from Colchester Cycling Campaign, C-Bus and the Wivenhoe Society – y’know, the kind of groups that you would want to have on board if you were trying to promote bicycling within the borough.
The esteemed members of the CBC Planning Committee will be meeting on 24th June, 6pm at the Town Hall to make a decision on the application. Bicycle lock up provision is available along the High Street.
Disclaimer: I am rather keen on bicycling.
You don’t say.
Chapeau!
#ridecolchester, blah blah blah, but probably not around Boundary Road, once this behemoth of a carbuncle in praise of the car industry is built.
Oh – a bit of balance: the University is staging a Green Fair on campus on Thursday. Car parking might be a bit of an issue, Comrades.






































































