Hub Questions

23 July 2010 » 9 Comments

How to solve a problem like Streatham Hub? Preferably by keeping local politicians and corporate paymasters out of the whole process. That was pretty much the conclusion come the end of @ChukaUmunna‘s first People’s Question Time, held in the Labour MP’s Streatham constituency on Thursday evening.

Listen!

The Hub is a headline writer’s gift that keeps on giving. At any one time over the past ten years, stories of mismanagement have surfaced out of SW16.

The latest entry log states that @lambeth_council has now admitted that “plans will not move forward” for the temporary swimming pool in Streatham, and Tesco stating that “Lambeth Council has compromised in choosing Pope’s Road as a site for the temporary ice rink.”

Cripes.

The Hub saga story so far…

In a classic you scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours scenario, the corporate superstore was granted planning permission in Streatham, in return for building a new leisure centre and a new ice rink. So far, so good.

The trouble is that this was almost ten years ago. The scheme is filled with as much uncertainty a decade later as it was back in the day. The timeline up until 2010 has included Tesco holding all the cards and threatening to walk away unless an increased floor space was granted, the closure (and failure to re-open) of Streatham Leisure Centre and the continued search for a temporary ice rink in Streatham.

Ah yes - about that Streatham Brixton temporary ice rink. It is the “continuity of ice” clause in the original planning document that led the good @ChukaUmunna to hold this current crisis meeting.

Essentially Tesco has to provide an ice pad at all times in Streatham. This was fine with the original agreement, which involved constructing the brand new rink on the Hub site, and then knocking down the old barn.

The corporate paymaster became impatient however, and wanted to bulldoze the site with one great big swing of the wrecking ball. Meanwhile @lambeth_council was left looking rather silly, searching around for a suitable site in an urban borough to place a whopping great big temporary ice pad.

The packed assembly hall at Dunraven School on Thursday night was unanimous in rejecting @lambeth_council’s current plan to shift Streatham Ice Rink down the A23 to Pope’s Road Car Park in Brixton.

This has emerged as the U-turn choice from the @LambethLabour cabinet, after the whole community united against the bonkers plan to place the ice pad on Streatham Common.

This is a highly emotive issue,” admitted @ChukaUmunna at the start of the People’s Question Time. “There is a perception in the community that residents have been held in the dark over recent months.”

Sandra Fryer, representing the council as the Divisional Director of Strategies and Partnerships stated:

“We have been working with Tesco since March on the location. Streatham Common had processing issues [eh?] - it would have taken us longer than we wanted to place the rink here. There were also technical issues. It wasn’t clear where the power source would come from.”

You would have hoped that before rubber-stamping the Streatham Common site back in March, cabinet would have had the foresight to address basic issues such as where the power for the ice pad was going to come from.

A solution is available, slightly closer to home than the Pope’s Road compromise.

We also looked at a site on Streatham High Road,” admitted Fryer. “Tesco have a budget however, and weren’t able to progress with this option.”

And so it seems that Pope’s Road became the preferred location on account of @lambeth_council already owning the site. Two birds can be killed with one stone, by demolishing the structurally unsafe council car park, and then plonking the ice pad there instead.

The fear for the Streatham skating and hockey community however is that Pope’s Road becomes permanent, and the south end of the borough loses one of it’s most historic and cultural sites of interest forever.

Having skipped the previous Streatham Hub public meeting, it was decent for the corporate paymaster to turn up this time. Mike Kissman, the UK Corporate Affairs Manager for Tesco, told the meeting:

“Running an ice rink is not something that we have a great deal of experience in.”

Best learn on the job then, Mr Corporate Affairs Man. Tesco will be financing the temporary pad and is expected to either manage the facility itself, or put in place a management team that is capable of the job.

Questions then followed from the floor.

“The plans for Streatham Hub have chopped and changed so much, what guarantees can you give this meeting that this won’t happen again?”

Apt timing for the fashionably late arrival of Councillor Florence Nosegbe, the Cabinet Member for Culture, Sport and the Olympics:

“We own Pope’s Road - we can control the process. It will be easier for the council to move forward.”

Tesco’s Kissman added:

“Time is the issue for Tesco.”

You can bet it is. Every week that Tesco hasn’t got a superstore open in Streatham is a week where the competitors along the High Road are rubbing their hands and lining their tills. Plus it’s, ahem, a little late in the day for Tesco to be complaining about the Hub timeline after a decade of dithering.

A speaker from the floor came back to the location of the temporary rink, and picked up on the point why Pope’s Road has been chosen, rather than the High Road location:

“With annual profits recently revealed, plus with the planned increased of 20,000 extra floor space at Streatham, Tesco is not exactly light of wallet right now. Why can’t the company pay to finance the staging of the temporary rink along the High Road?”

This question achieved the loudest applause of the evening, if not the most adequate of answers:

We have been through difficult times,” said Kissman. “We are still here. We are an organisation, and not a local authority.”

Which all rather begs the question who is actually controlling leisure in Lambeth? The local authority that is reliant upon the private capital to finance the schemes, or the private capital paymaster that won’t be accountable?

Jimmy Gardner from the Streatham Chiefs Ice Hockey team then made an impassioned speech:

“We had a show of hands this week. If Streatham Ice Rink moves to Pope’s Road then my club will fold. This then becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy - there is no demand for ice hockey in Streatham, and so there is no need to build a rink back in SW16.”

Why won’t you work with other local councils?” asked another question. “If Lambeth Council actually spoke to the likes of the neighbouring Merton Council, you might actually find a site closer to home.”

Other observations from the floor centred on the Brixton location, with accusations that “the Lambeth cabinet is not visible in Streatham. Everything has to be Brixton based.”

The meeting then moved on to discuss dimensions - dimensions of the temporary ice pad and dimensions of possible parking space at Pope’s Road.

Councillor Nosegbe confirmed that the temporary pad will be 56m x 26m in dimension - a size smaller than a standard hockey pad, and a space that is unsuitable for figure skating, as the mother of a Streatham skater pointed out.

The @LambethLabour Councillor also confirmed that there is the “possibility” of parking for twenty spaces at Pope’s Road. The average hockey team benches twenty-five players.

Finally we came on to the Elephant in the Streatham meeting road - swimming.

Oh Lordy.

With all the focus on the temporary ice pad, swimming has been overlooked in Streatham. Swimming has been overlooked in all of Lambeth over the past four years, if truth be told.

Whereas ice time had a continuity clause in the Hub deal, swimming has historically not been treated to this privilege. This is probably because @lambeth_council wasn’t expecting to close Streatham Leisure Centre late last year, without an alternative plan in place.

Councillor Nosegbe said:

“I recognise that there has been an under-investment in the pool. We don’t have the funds for a temporary arrangement in Streatham. We won’t be going forward with this.”

Where all of this leaves the @LambethLabour election manifesto pledge of “free swimming for every resident” is somewhat uncertain right now.

A final question pondered: “What will happen at the cabinet meeting on Monday night?

The implication within the question was whether or not Councillor Nosegbe would report back to her @LambethLabour friends on the strength of feeling against the Pope’s Road compromise that is currently being felt within Streatham.

The reality of course is that the @LambethLabour cabinet will have a friendly chit chat on Monday evening, and the temporary ice pad will be agreed to be put in place at Pope’s Road in under half an hour after the meeting has commenced.

The real question however is will the Pope’s Road rink ever actually open, and more importantly, will @ChukaUmunna still be holding his People’s Question Time in five, ten years time, still pondering the Streatham Hub question?

9 Comments on "Hub Questions"

  1. Richard
    23/07/2010 at 8:30 am Permalink

    To answer the final question, no. If he, and his Labour colleagues, don’t sort this mess, many of us will be lobbying hard to kick ‘em out of office.

  2. Geoff
    23/07/2010 at 9:59 am Permalink

    Depressing beyond belief. Us SW16ers seem to get the rough end of the deal no matter how this plays. No swimming, no likelihood of swimming. No ice rink, either permanent or temporary for the next 2, potentially 3 years and then beyond.

    Its true the everything Lambeth Council seems to do is focused on Brixton, completely disregarding a whole swathe of the borough. I’m glad they’ll be no temporary structure on the Common but why not a location in Crystal Palace? Plenty of spare land there and it’s a short (well 15 min) 249 bus ride from the existing rink site.

  3. Julia Bellis
    23/07/2010 at 11:05 am Permalink

    God this is depressing. Between them Lambeth council and Tescos are going to destroy a wonderful skating community, having already allowed a wonderful swimming pool to crumble due to sheer neglect. Tooting Bec lido was saved thanks to user pressure organised by the South London Swimming Club and is now flourishing. But that’s in Wandsworth borough of course.

  4. Anon
    23/07/2010 at 11:46 am Permalink

    Does Chukka actually have an opinion on this or is he posturing from on high?

    It strikes me that he has done very little apart from instigate public gatherings…

  5. Ben Everitt
    23/07/2010 at 2:55 pm Permalink

    I still fail to understand how this has taken quite so long.

    Tesco want to build a shop that will make them pots of cash. They are a business that is really good at making pots of cash. In fact, they are so keen to build a new shop to make them pots of cash that they will also build us a hub.

    Every day they don’t have a shop on that site, they miss out on some extra money. Missing out on extra money is not what supermarkets are about.
    Lambeth council wants a hub and doesn’t seem to mind a new shop. Every day there is no hub on the site, the residents of Streatham have no leisure facilities. Not having Leisure facilities is not what Councils are about.

    It seems as though parties have strong incentives to get this done – the Council has a duty to its citizens (to provide leisure facilities – what Councils do); and Tesco has a duty to its shareholders (pots of cash – what supermarkets do). Win-win.

    So the conclusion must be that however good at making pots of cash Tesco is, the Council is so bad at being a Council that they have actually stopped Tescos making extra money.

    Whilst I’m sure that no one will shed any tears for Tesco on the loss of their potential profit, it’s still staggering that Lambeth’s commitment to not having Leisure facilities in Streatham must be greater than Tesco’s commitment to making money.

    There’ll be no arguments too, when I suggest that, left alone, Tesco is hardly anybody’s first choice as an engine of social good. But then that’s not what they are, they’re a supermarket. They’re an engine of cheap food and consumer goods. And profit. However there’s no reason why a partnership between Lambeth Council and Tesco can’t be an engine social good.

    Lambeth has no money because there’s none left in the public sector. Tesco has access to pots of money (via its shareholders – mainly pension and investment funds) and has indicated that its shareholders are keen to use some of their money to build a Hub; to build a store; that will make them more money.

    I know it’s more complicated than that, but my question is: why? It doesn’t need to be. How can a Council holding all the cards fail to get the thing built. Throughout this entire process Tesco have behaved like you would expect a private sector partner to – they’ve tried to maximise profit for their shareholders. That’s what they do and they’re good at it. The same can’t be said of the council – throughout the process they have failed to capitalise on the trump card they have always held: Tesco want to make money and are willing to build a hub.

    How hard is it to make a profit-hungry megacorp like Tesco build a supermarket that will make them more money? Very hard, if you’re Lambeth Council.

  6. Warren
    23/07/2010 at 3:19 pm Permalink

    Maybe I’m missing something obvious, but why not let Tesco knock the whole lot down and start work on the proviso that a new leisure centre is built and finished first - within, say, four months (off-season for ice hockey)? Then they can build the rest. Obviously there would need to be massive, multi million-pound clause if they default.

  7. Anon
    23/07/2010 at 4:49 pm Permalink

    All sensible suggestions… I’ve no idea why the council didn’t think of such a proposal. It sounds to me like they’ve rolled over at every opportunity.

  8. Michael
    23/07/2010 at 7:17 pm Permalink

    Putting aside the actual Hub itself for a moment, one of the disappointing things for me is how Lambeth Labour successfully shifted the narrative following the closure of the Leisure Centre to put the blame on Tesco, and that people went along with this.

    Final approval for the project was not reached until December 2007, and if anyone must be blamed for this (and we live in a culture that cannot abide imperfect situations being without blame) then that belongs equally to Tesco, Lambeth, the Mayor, and TfL.

    Tesco did then delay things by putting in a revised planning application. This was approved in September 2008, but would have seen the swimming pool closed for 9 months, rather than the 18 months as in the original plans. This is something that currently seems to be overlooked, that there was never any guarantee of continuity of swimming.

    The knock-build-knock-build phased development plans ensured that the old arena could not be closed until its replacement was ready, there was no such plan for the leisure centre. It was always going to be out of action for some time.

    Unfortunately then the global recession happened and Tesco froze their plans. This is an excuse, certainly, but at least an understandable one and not something unique to Tesco or Streatham.

    With all due respect to Ben though, your comment is a pretty simplistic Tory view that is far too unfair on the council. To say that Tesco wanted to build the Hub and Lambeth held them back is just not true. Let us not forget the original plan, before it became the hub, was that Tesco wanted to knock down the old bus depot, ice arena, and Sunday school to build a new store and housing. No new leisure centre, and no replacement ice arena.

    But that aside, a big part of the funding of the Hub was to come from housing, and in a depressed market Tesco baulked. Rightly or wrongly they stopped themselves from proceeding, not the council. They felt that they would not make enough money for their shareholders in a depressed housing market to justify the huge investment cost.

    But they could afford to wait. And with the ice arena and leisure centre both operating at that time, so could we all. Which is why there was no major outcry against the delays until last November. Lambeth Council deserve blame for allowing the leisure centre to reach the point it became unusable, they deserve contempt for the way they have tried to shift the blame onto Tesco, but not for holding Tesco to account to the community.

  9. geoff forster
    14/08/2010 at 2:35 pm Permalink

    The Streatham area / wards are not represented on the Labour controlled Council’s Cabinet.

    “…I was shocked by how little attention the area got from the then Labour Council. It was seen as the posh and privileged part of Lambeth, so less deserving than other parts of the borough…”

    Jean Gaffin Labour parliamentary candidate for the 1974 election.

    From the “The Streatham Society News” Summer 2010

Hi Stranger, leave a comment:

Subscribe to Comments