Shared Cycling Space
Published as part of the Keep Colchester Cycling project.
A couple of cycling specific news stories have come out of Colchester in the past week, highlighting how pedal power is starting to gain momentum around the town.
First we have the news that cyclists will be allowed to use three Colchester town centre pedestrianised routes from next week:
“Essex County Council has made an order to allow people to cycle along Culver Street West and East and Long Wyre Street from Monday 4th April. The move is the latest in a three year project to turn Colchester into a Cycle Town, using £4.2 million of government and local authority funding.”
This is a welcome move, although one that needs to be introduced with a degree of caution from cyclists and pedestrians alike:
“Town centre traders and shoppers said many cyclists already used the roads, although the police often stopped them.”
As some of the comments in the Gazette story suggest, even keen cyclists around Colchester share some reservations about the shared use of space with pedestrians. There’s quite a leap of faith in cycling considerately with walkers about, and then being the Lycra King as you treat Culver Street as a Tour de France time trial:
“Even as a cyclist, I have big reservations about this. While most will cycle sensibly, some will not. Shared-use pavements can work where there are not many pedestrians, but it’s a potentially disastrous combination when you have cycles trying no negotiate through wandering kids, little old ladies, wheelchairs, bagged-down shoppers, people emerging from doorways etc. Head Street, High Street, Queen Street and St John’s Street are all OK for cycling along, but I see problems with this plan.”
The solution it would seem is that there is surly space for everyone. Trying to cycle down Queen Street en route to Slack Space can be a little hairy if you adopt your urban cycling warrior persona. Busses will cut you up if you aggressively invade the space.
A little consideration however, a polite hand wave and a negotiated use of the road space through eye contact, and most bus drivers will kindly give cyclists the right of way.
This food chain for shared space should also trickle down, allowing pedestrians to feel safe amongst cyclists around Colchester. Alienating other pavement users is not going to help the cause of Colchester as a thriving Cycling Town.
Meanwhile, the very same money that has been able to support Colchester Cycling Town (and also Keep Colchester Cycling) is about to come to a close. A separate news story in the Gazette reports:
“A total of £4.2million has been invested in improving Cycling in Colchester in the last three years, but the funding ends today.”
This doesn’t mean the close of the project, simply the ending of the first phase, with hopefully a future for cycling now established high up on the agenda:
“Colchester Cycling Campaign members Will Bramhill and Paul Avison say transport chiefs will have to choose between whether to promote more road cycling or to try a Dutch-style system, with more dedicated paths for cyclists.”
“The group says the Dutch-style system would see all residential roads made 20mph zones, and other major changes introduced, but would result in a bigger increase in people cycling.”
Wivenhoe is about to implement a 20mph zone around the lower part of the town, after consultation with local residents. The narrow streets around Wivenhoe act as a natural speed deterrent for most motorists. It would be interesting to see how residential roads around the Greenstead for example would take to this experiment.
As the Gazette recognises, cycling to key destinations such as North Station or the General Hospital can be hellish by bicycle. For Colchester to become a true Cycling Town, consideration is needed as to how best feed cyclists into these key locations.

















